According to the Washington Post, she first met with McCain in February, but nobody ever found out.
This is a woman used to keeping secrets.
She can be trusted with our National Security.
1
For some reason, the GOP fails to mention this as well as other benefits they possess. They prefer to continually shoot themselves in the proverbial foot.
Posted by: Ol' BC at October 19, 2008 09:28 AM (tbxFf)
2
You forgot to mention that she looks good in a swimsuit. It's really hard to take any of this very seriously. Palin a national security expert? Because she gets briefed? Good grief. A person could toss a rock in any crowd and hit someone with more experience.
Posted by: Karlo at October 20, 2008 06:24 AM (AgQ4p)
3
As compared to Obama, who has...erm...uhhh...hmmmm.... Just WHAT has he done, Karlo? He has a lower security clearence than Sarah, so no,HE doesn't get those same security briefings, even as a candidate.
I wouldn't sling the "inexperienced" charges around too loudly Karlo, for they will inevitably turn around and bite you square in the ASS.
Oh,yeah,Obama is the one who worked in the same building on the same floor and on the same boards of projects with a certain unrepentant terrorist and then claims that he "never really had much to do the guy". (Oh, and I was 8 when he committed those acts....even though he PUBLICLY said only
2 years ago that "he wish he had done more") I didn't know his past.
Ayres, Dohrn,Rezco,Wright, Campaigning in Kenya for an avowed Socialist politician, now accused with genocide....etc, etc,etc...by his associations will you know him.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at October 20, 2008 02:15 PM (wt/Ku)
4
Why can't we just be honest and say that Palin and Obama don't have much experience--Palin having even less than Obama. Who cares? When just about everyone in Washington is corrupt, why would we want experience. The problem isn't the lack but rather the ridiculous attempt to manufacture experience out of thin air (very cold, thin air).
Posted by: Karlo at October 20, 2008 09:00 PM (d3ObA)
5
"Palin having MORE than Obama."
There, fixed your statement factually, KARLO, I know you want to be accurate.
I agree with you about the corruption in Washington, and thats ANOTHER reason to vote for Palin over Obama; Obama has closer ties to Washington than Palin; EVEN disregarding that he is a product of the Chicago Daly political machine; which has made Chicago a symbol for political corruption. (The city where the dead continue to vote Democratic for decades after internment) Palin fought against her own party machine in Alaska..and WON. THAT is experience we should vote for.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at October 20, 2008 10:46 PM (wt/Ku)
6
I think she's a bit of a Sarah-come-lately when it comes to the fighting of corruption, opposing projects only after it becomes politically expedient to do so. On the other hand, Alaska seems to be so rife with corruption these days that taking a step in any direction is likely to lead one of the corpse of a recently fallen politico.
Posted by: Karlo at October 21, 2008 04:37 PM (AgQ4p)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
