June 28, 2005
SCOTUS....AGAIN
Well, the Supremes seem to be on a roll; first they essentially negate private property rights, and now they've ruled that the police don't really HAVEto do their jobs in protecting the people as individuals, even whenthere is a court ordered restraining order.....
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
And to all those GFW's out there that say "YOU don't need a weapon; that's the job of the Police":
I TOLD YOU SO.
In the final analysis, we are all responsible for our own protection; and for the protection of those we hold dear. And with this most recent ruling, this fact of life even more evident to anyone with more than three firing neurons left. If you aren't willing to protect yourself/family; then you are nothing more than a parasite on the body of society.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
10:37 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 134 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Every restraining order should be accompanied by a pistol, a concealed carry permit, and a target with the restrainee's picture superposed.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at June 28, 2005 07:39 PM (xX0fS)
2
I dunno about that, Walt, but I DEFINITELY wonder exactly how the people will defend themselves if the police have no obligations except to take the guns away from potential crime victims.
RWR
Posted by: RightWingRocker at June 29, 2005 04:03 AM (EBSNi)
14kb generated in CPU 0.9085, elapsed 0.8515 seconds.
45 queries taking 0.8209 seconds, 132 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
45 queries taking 0.8209 seconds, 132 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.