Steyn hits another oneMark Steyn hits another one out of the ballpark. Europe is a lost cause, despite the fact that there are indications that the Dutch, at least, are waking up to the danger they are facing.
I fear that the inertia of the Continent as a whole will preclude an easy reversal of that danger however. The United States has come to Europe's rescue twice in the last hundred years, and we have continued to assure Europes liberty for the last sixty years, leading them into a sense of complacency; this time, it should be up to the Europeans to extricate themselves. They have to come to the realization that freedom ISN'T free, and not depend on outside forces to pay the costs.
1
Another winner, they no longer need the U.S. Europe has their beloved UN to protect them, and when things get tough they can always rely on the French Foreign Legion to rescue them.
Posted by: Jack at March 01, 2005 08:08 PM (ngJRu)
The Left keeps asking "was it worth the American lives lost to free Iraq?" without acknowledging that Iraq was merely a part of a larger stradegy in the Middle East, one which seems to starting to bear fruit.
The final results are by no means certain, indeed, they will not be known for at least another generation, but if they continue as they are, I believe that, Yes Virginia, those men and women sacrificed to the final measure in a worthy cause.
We must stay the course and continue to fight the good fight so that the gains garnered by those sacrifices will not be thrown away.
"useful Idiots"
I told a commenter in an earlier thread that Joseph Stalin had a term for those that didn't have a loyalty to their society as a whole, and the term was "useful idiots". Well, it seems that even former Presidents and First Ladies can fall into that category.
I don't believe that the Carters were aware of any wrongdoing involved with their charitable orginization, much less had an active hand in promulgating that wrongdoing, but the fact remains that they didn't keep a close enough eye on what was happening through the ageis of their good works.
In dealing with people such as Saddam Hussein, it behooves the people dealing with him to expend extra vigilence in those dealings to ensure that they truly do meet the expectations put upon them, and not used as a cover for the graft and perfidity that Saddam dealt in as a matter of course. It seems that the Carters fell into the "the UN sanctions it, so it MUST be on the up and up" trap. It also serves as yet another example of the corruption filled cesspool that the UN has become.
That the specific donations were legal and (hopefully) put to good use doesn't negate the broader taint of corruption and influence peddleing that they helped to engender. "useful idiots" indeed!
Posted by: Jack at March 01, 2005 08:10 PM (ngJRu)
2
The Stalin quote is certainly apropos to your point. Stalin was a cynical nationalist who placed nation (and his own personal aggrandizement) about every ideal he pretended to hold. The fact that he would call people who didn't share his patriotic fervor "idiots" seems to be a point in their favor.
Posted by: Karlo at March 03, 2005 03:55 PM (HoLw7)
Fiber Optic Fence?
It seems that new technology in the fiber optics field may prove to be the solution to securing large areas of our southern border. Should the testing of the system prove it to be as efficacious as it is believed it will be, I hope that it will be deployed in the shortest time possible. It's far past time that we get serious about the integrity of our borders.
A Conservative ProtestDavis MedianKritik has been fighting the good fight in Deuthchland against the forces of Idiotarianism. He has pictures of a protest that he helped sponser in Mainze, Deutchland last week.
Keep up the good fight David!
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
12:41 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
3 Imams to be expelled
From The Dutch Report comes a post that shows welcome signs that the Dutch government has begun to fight the problem of Islamic fundementalism in the country. It's about time that common sense started coming to the fore.
1
It's a start toward removing those that will never assimilate into the society and will always foment terror and disruption, the same thing needs to be done in the United States also.
Posted by: Jack at February 25, 2005 07:37 PM (HBR1f)
Privatization Myths
FINALLY! some economists put the "myth" stamp on the so called "transition costs" of following President Bush's proposal to partialyy privatize Social Security. The Democrats main argument is that the scheme would require up to two trillion dollars in additional "transition costs". And the general public, being uninformed on just how Social Security operates and ignorant of macroeconomics in any case, are being scared to death by these claims.
As Edward Prescott, 2004 winner of the Bank of Sweden Nobel Prize in Economics, and Lawrence Hunter, senior research fellow with the Institute for Policy Innovation, show, there ARE no transition costs, merely a shifting of debt from one form to another. Those costs are ALLREADY BEING INCURRED under the present system.
The politicians in our government have long been conducting a hoax on the American people, and apparently, the present state of education in the country today has failed to give the people the ability to see through that hoax.
IF I was a conspiracy theorist, which I am NOT, I would only conclude that NEA policies were a plot to ensure the docility of the masses though indoctrination rather than forwarding education....still if you look at the decline in real education of the last 20 or 30 years, it does lead one to wonder if the conspiracy nuts don't have something, after all?
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
09:45 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 2 kb.
Hillery Speaks Sense, for once
I may have serious feelings of animosity towards Senator Clinton, but when she has it correct, I must ackowledge it. Even if it's a ploy to try to move herself into a "centerists" position for a presumed Presidential bid in 2008.
She has gone public in stating that we should NOT set a firm deadline on withdrawing from Iraq. I believe that to be good policy, both in our, and the Iraqi people's best interests.
Kudos to her stance in this one instance, too bad she has shown herself to be a closet Socialist, or I might have to start considering her as a candidate worthy of voting for.....NAH, that will NEVER happen!
1
Actually, she did make several similar comments last October, I think. She was speaking in Iraq to the troops at the time ... so if that trip was not in October, I cheerfully stand corrected.
Posted by: Adriane at February 22, 2005 05:19 AM (bN2BQ)
2
We'll trade you one Hillary for one McCain. (We'll have to put him through some heavy reindoctrination sessions, mind you.)
Posted by: Karlo at February 23, 2005 07:20 PM (HoLw7)
3
No need for a trade Karlo, we'll give McCain to you. His entry into your way of thinking is 85% there anyway.
Posted by: delftsman3 at February 23, 2005 07:25 PM (LmMJW)
4
I still see the need for heavy reindoctrination sessions. (; Actually, I disagree that McCain is "left" in any sense of the word. But he is at least independent and at times principles--qualities lacking in most of our politicians. That said, if he ran for president, I would never vote for him since I don't care for his stand on most issues.
Posted by: Karlo at February 24, 2005 11:58 AM (HoLw7)
5
"That said, if he ran for president, I would never vote for him since I don't care for his stand on most issues."
SOMETHING we agree on for once!
...and at times principles--qualities lacking in most of our politicians.
You HAD to ruin it with that statement. McCain is for one thing and one thing only, and that's John McCain. I believe that Preident Bush is one of the most pricipled politicians there has ever been.
You may not agree with those principles, but he tells you exactly what he believes and why he believes that way and then proceedes to follow the course he has outlined, even in the face of some of the greatest opposition that any President has ever had to deal with.
THAT is the definition of being principled. I think that that is one of the reasons that the Left hates him so much, they know that he won't go along to get along.
Those tapes made by a "friend" of his reveal that to be true, the private Bush is the same as the public Bush. They also revealed that he was willing to go against what the Left considers his "Main" voters bloc, the evangelical Christians, in his remarks about gays. For that alone, I am certainly grateful.
Posted by: delftsman3 at February 24, 2005 12:38 PM (61vfJ)
6
Rather than principled, I think Bush is loyal--to his own true constituency of the extremely wealthy. When it comes to the smoke-screen of social issues, on the other hand, he's the ultimate opportunist. Are we to believe that this cocaine-sniffing draft-dodging weasel who never worked a damn day in his life has these heart-felt religious convictions that make him stand up for the war on drugs, the value of hard work, religious values, and a robust and aggressive foreign policy? A bit hard to swallow to say the least. Each time I see him in front of a podium shifting around as he whines about how someone else just "doesn't get it," I just can't believe that anyone sees him as the example of a "leader." You could toss a rock into any crowd of people with 2 or more people in it and hit a better leader.
Posted by: Karlo at February 24, 2005 03:48 PM (HoLw7)
7
"loyal--to his own true constituency of the extremely wealthy."
"draft-dodging weasel who never worked a damn day in his life..."
Most perfect descriptions of Senator Splash I have ever seen! Thanks Karlo!
Posted by: delftsman3 at February 28, 2005 06:21 PM (61vfJ)
Want to be a Blogger?
Ever wanted to become a blogger, but just don't know how to go about it?
Have a blog, but don't have a banner that just "fits" the tenor of your blog?
Well Mamamontezz Loves to add to her blog family and banners are her hobby.
Your new blog will be constructed over at Blog-City.com, so it won't cost you anything to try out the blogging scene.
She won't charge you for a banner, although Love Offerings to her Paypal would be most appreciated, let your conscience be your guide to that. She does it out of the desire to contribute to the medium that has provided her so much joy, but it does take time, and thats enough said about that.
Just send me an e-mail with your request and/or banner ideas, and I'll get them to Mama ASAP. She'll tweak it until you're satisfied with the results.
1
My thought after reading this is maybe the perpetrator could be found just hanging around.
Posted by: Jack at February 20, 2005 06:38 PM (AIV5b)
2
Wow, could you imagine if we had such a law here? Clinton never would have even been looked at for his crimes.
Hell with laws like this we'd have to open the doors to many of our prisons.
That is just insane.
SlagleRock Out!
Posted by: SlagleRock at February 21, 2005 07:00 AM (AtSju)
Another little quiz
Take the quiz: "WHAT RELIGION BESTS SUITS YOU?" Category Unknown You don't fit into any of the above categories, so perhaps before you get angry or confused, check what other religion(s) you scored the highest on. For example, you might be a Christian-Pagan, or a Discordian-Wiccan. Just use a bit of logic. However, according to this test, you're simply 100% YOU. You don't fit into any of the world's boxes.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
11:00 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Most of what you say here is the same retoric the Bush administration has been spoon feeding us since 2003.
Iraq, Iran, Pakistian, nor Afghanistan NEVER attacked the US. In fact no country has made an attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor. We were attacked by a terrorist organization which had many bases of operations in all the above mentioned countries including Saudia Arabia. Who incidently remains on the list of friendly countries, despite the fact that they too had ties to Bin Laden. One can only speculate that the reason for that is their equally strong ties to our own President and his family.
Iraq is now a quagmire, and the new #1 training ground for terrorist. There were never any PROVEN ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda.
What right has the US to demand that the rest of the world embrace democracy and Christianity? Why shouldn't the Muslim religion flourish? Or should only Christians be allowed to spread their religious beliefs? Has it ever occurred to you people that MAYBE the people of the Middle East don't WANT democracy? Why is it you think we have the right to go into their part of the world and spread OUR message, but they do not have the same right to do so here? Since we can no longer rely on the media to report the unvarnished, unbiased truth, we don't really know what these people want. For every example you can give of Iraqi's who say they want what the US has brought to their country I can give you equal reports of Iraqi's who say they want the US to go away and wish they'd never come to their country. I'm sure the truth lies somewhere in between.
When all is said and done, if the US kept our nose out of other country's business (unless they ASKED for help) and put more focus on the problems here within our own borders, we MIGHT be a better, safer, and more respected country throughout the world.
One thing is for certain, neither Iran nor N.Korea has made any indications that they have thoughts, ideas, or plans to attack the US. They have both stated their persuit of nuclear weapons is for their own use and protection. Considering Israel's treatment of Palestine, I can understand why any country in the Middle East might feel they need protection from them. As for N.Korea, the US would bode well how they deal with them, least we awaken the large bear that sleeps in their backyard. I do not believe that China will tolerate an attack on N.Korea. Which may well be why Bush & Co. are putting their focus on Iran. Either way, to attempt to deal with either country in the same manner they did Iraq, will be a fatal mistake. A mistake that will cost many many more American lives than the 1400+ that have been lost in Iraq and Afghanistan. A mistake that more than likely will bring our warmongering to our own shores. Even the Patriot Act and Homeland Security will not be able to protect us. You can mark my words on that one.
Posted by: wanda at February 17, 2005 08:29 PM (1ivbm)
2
Incidently, Maccabee has long been a reader and poster on my blog. He always leaves his blog address and he knows I know his email address. I am sure he assumed you would make your response in my comments since that is where the conversation started. I would have assumed that much as well.
Posted by: wanda at February 17, 2005 08:33 PM (1ivbm)
3
1. check the email that maccabee left here and try to use it, it will come right back to you.
I would have much preferered to send it to him in an e--mail due to the length, and I really didn't want to make it seem I was being catty by posting it.
2. I felt that my response would have taken up too much of your bandwidth, and at the least would have been broken up into at least three parts due to your limit on the space of an individual comment.
Posted by: delftsman3 at February 17, 2005 08:58 PM (h4ZzC)
4
"What right has the US to demand that the rest of the world embrace democracy and Christianity?"
Just WHERE did I advocate that Muslims should convert to Christianity? One of the points of my little screed was that Islam doesn't compremise with other religions as Christianity and most other religions do. Christians haven't tried to force adherance to their religion since the last Crusade. Even the so called "moderate forms", in the end, preach non tolerance of other religions.
"Iraq is now a quagmire, and the new #1 training ground for terrorists."
It's such a quagmire that ordinary Iraqi citizens are starting to take action agains't the "insurgents" themselves, without resorting to even their own security forces, much less the US forces.
"Has it ever occurred to you people that MAYBE the people of the Middle East don't WANT democracy?"
Yes all people's will have a different form of democracy than ours,suited to their own culture, but I truly don't believe that any SANE person would wish to live under the yoke of a dictator willingly. The Left is fond of calling conservatives racists, but examine your statement and tell me that it isn't fundementally racist IE, "they just don't know any better and don't want anything better".
"We were attacked by a terrorist organization which had many bases of operations in all the above mentioned countries including Saudia Arabia."
Yes, and any country that knowingly and willingly harbored terrrorists are ipso facto terrorists themselves, and I WOULD include SA in that group. The point is that in taking on Iraq and Afghanistan, we were applying pressure internally to the other nations without HAVING to resort to brute force. And with the first time ever option of independant local officials being allowed to run in SA, the premise seems to be holding true.
"Considering Israel's treatment of Palestine,.."
Yeah Wanda...show me ONE instance where Israel came into the territories to bomb children in their school. Every action taken by Israel has been a response to Palistinian acts of violence, and targeted to the combatants, not civilians. If the Palestinians want a country, let them demonstrate it by stopping their acts of random violence. Israel has offered time and again things that weren't in their best interest of national security, and time after time the Palistinians have responded with suicide bombers targeting civilians. As far as sharing Jeruselem, you might as well ask the Muslims to share Mecca. IT AIN'T GOING TO HAPPEN.
"As for N.Korea, the US would bode well how they deal with them, least we awaken the large bear that sleeps in their backyard."
It's in China's best interests not to allow NoKo to start something that will pull China into it. I really believe that in this case China and the US have a common goal in maintaining the peace. China will put the brakes on NoKO, not us.
"Which may well be why Bush & Co. are putting their focus on Iran."
The nuclear genie is out of the biottle with NoKO, but it would be better that Iran doesn't join the club. There is a large segment of the Irani populace that yearns to throw over the present regime. We should nurture and aid that feeling. The revolution should come from within, not imposed from without.
The whole point of the exercise is to prevent the need for furthur military actions Wanda, not enlarge them. A dangerous game, it's true, but there were no really viable alternatives.
Posted by: dekftsman3 at February 17, 2005 09:33 PM (h4ZzC)
5
I had to put on my tinfoil hat reading your analysis of the world and incessant insults about how we progressives don't live in the real world
then again, it was you people who said 9/11 and iraq were related and it tuirns out that every senior counterterrorsit expert said that was a stretch and it was never fully vetted
you said he had WMDs
not one iota of evidence has ever survived scrutiny beyond your talking points memos and bullshit repeats of Bush administration exagerations
you guys saaid it would cost us $12 to $30 billion at the most and we would be drawing down troops by september 2003
inbstead we are caught in a sandpit that has cost us upwards of $300 billion and the cost of twelve wounded and three dead americans a day
you said the tax cuts would creat jobs
we are STILL minus 500,000 jobs in the hole
our allies have abandoned us,
oil is $45 a barrell
over 3 million more Americans have joined the poverty list since Bush has been in power
The US lasy year ranked 42nd in the world in infant mortality, right behind Cuba
( BTW thanks for telling us the project for New American century plan for attacking everyone who has oil.)
at the end of the day, none of this combat has achieved a godamned thing but kills tens of thousands
my guess is- you have never lived outside the US. You have a high scholl education- you listen to Rush and Faux News
You bet, you're a dummbass
and you're wrong
by the way, the Netherlands has a higher standard of living than the US, higher productivity, longer life spans, less poverty and almost one tenth our crime rate- also, the typical Dutch 7th grader knows more american history than a US Senior.
What else do you want to be wrong about?
Posted by: Maccabee at February 18, 2005 06:36 PM (Pzsbc)
Life on Mars?
Seems some NASA scientists are convinced that there is a high probablity of microbial life existing on present day Mars.
If confirmed, this will be one of the greatest discoveries ever made.
I just wish they would take civilian volunteers to make the trip there in person to do the research. I don't have any scientific qualifications, but on the other hand, if a "regular joe" can be convinced, maybe he could blog the news to the world in a manner that everyone can understand? And I would gladly do windows to be included in the first group.....
1
I don't know. Mar's best day is like Antarctica's worse (minus the oxygen). Even so, I love the idea of heading out for other planets. Save me a spot!
Posted by: karlo at February 18, 2005 07:00 PM (T/9Cl)
2nd Amendment in actionAnother case of a citizen defending himself and his property from those that would threaten both. Note that the article claims that the assailents were using "assault" rifles, but don't bother attempting to identify just what kind of weapons were used. Note also that the store owner was able to repel TWO men armed with the GFW's most feared weapon with a .357 handgun and wound two of the would be thieves, one critically, and disable their get-away vehicle. All I have to say is BRAVO !, but you need more range time, they weren't DATS.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
04:53 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
The Straight Scoop from Charlie Daniels
We are indundated with moans and cries from the Moonbat Left about how Eeeeevil we are to the residents of Guantanamo Bay. Charlie Daniels reports on what he observed on a recent USO tour there. And DON'T even bother trying to tell me that the "authorities hid the true conditions there from him", I'll just laugh in your face. If the Red Cross can't find anything to bitch about, it isn't there, unless your willing to admit that they're just as incompetant as the average UN fact finding mission in the Sudan.
Take it away, Mr. Daniels!:
I've just returned from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Naval Air Station base
where we did three shows for the troops and toured several locations
around the post visiting with some of the finest military personnel
on planet earth. The kids seemed to really enjoy the shows and
especially liked "This Ain't No Rag, It's A Flag" and "In America".
We had a great time with them.
We saw Camp X-Ray, where the Taliban detainees are being held only
from a distance, but I picked up a lot of what's going on there from
talking with a lot of different people.
The truth of the matter is that this operation is under a microscope.
The Red Cross has an on site presence there and watches everything
that goes on very closely. The media is not telling you the whole
truth about what's going on over there. The truth is that these scum
bags are not only being treated humanely, but they are probably better
off healthwise and medically than they've ever been in their lives.
They are fed well, able to take showers and receive state of the art
medical care. And have their own Moslem chaplain. I saw several of
them in a field hospital ward where they were being treated in a state
of the art medical facility.
Now let's talk about the way they treat our people. First of all, they
have to be watched constantly. These people are committed and wanton
murderers who are willing to die just to kill someone else. One of the
doctors told me that when they had Taliban in the hospital the staff
had to really be careful with needles, pens and anything else which
could possibly be used as a weapon. They also throw their excrement
and urine on the troops who are guarding them. And our guys and gals
have shown great restraint in not retaliating. We are spending over a
million dollars a day maintaining and guarding these nasty killers and
anyone who wants to see them brought to the U.S.A. for trial is either
out of their heads or a lawyer looking for money and notoriety. Or
both.
I wish that the media and the Red Cross and all the rest of the
people who are so worried about these criminals would realize that
this is not a troop of errant Boy Scouts. These are killers of the
worst kind. They don't need protection from us, we need protection
from them. If you don't get anything else out of this soapbox, please
try to realize that when you see news coverage much of the time
you're not getting the whole story, but an account filtered through a
liberal mindset with an agenda.
We have two fights on our hands, the war against terror and the one
against the loudmouthed lawyers and left wing media who would sap the
strength from the American public by making us believe that we're
losing the war or doing something wrong in fighting it. Remember these
are the same people who told us that Saddam Hussein's Republican guard
was going to be an all but invincible enemy and that our smart bombs
and other weapons were not really as good as the military said that
they were.
They also took up for Bill Clinton while he was cavorting around the
Oval office with Monica Lewinsky while the terrorists were gaining
strength and bombing our Embassies and dragging the bodies of dead
American heroes around the dusty streets of Somalia. It's a shame that
we can't have an unbiased media who would just report the truth and
let us make up our own minds.
Here I must commend Fox News for presenting both sides much better
than the other networks. They are leaving the other cable networks in
the dust. People like being told the truth.
Our military not only needs but deserves our support. Let's give it to them.
The next time you read a media account about the bad treatment of the
Taliban in Cuba, remember what I told you. Been there done that.
Footnote: I got an e-mail from a rather irate first cousin of mine the
other day who has a daughter who's a lawyer and she seemed to think
that I was painting all lawyers with the same brush. Please understand
that I'm not doing that at all. That would be like saying that all
musicians were drug addicts. There are a lot of good and honest
attorneys out there. I happen to have one of them. But it seems that
they never get any airtime. It's always the radicals who get their
opinions heard, who fight the idea of the military tribunals and cite
The Constitution and the integrity of America as their source of
justifying their opinions. Well, first of all The Constitution says
"We the people of the United States", it doesn't mention any other
country.
And secondly as far as integrity is concerned, I don't think some of
these folks would know integrity if it bit them in the posterior.
What do you think? God Bless America.
Charlie Daniels
P.S. send this to everyone you can...the truth needs to be told. THE
REASON A DOG HAS SO MANY FRIENDS IS THAT HE WAGS HIS TAIL - NOT HIS
TONGUE
1
I notice you posted on Words on a Page that we are in Iraq because they attacked us.
Uh....when did Iraq ever attack us?
Just curious about what you are talking about
Posted by: Maccabee at February 17, 2005 04:40 PM (TY03r)
2
Maccabee, at least put up a valid address so I can respond in person...I tried to respond and Mailer Daemon just keeps returning it to me.
Posted by: delftsman3 at February 17, 2005 07:04 PM (h4ZzC)
Acidman strikes a blow
Acidman demonstrates the admirable trait of true independence, and an unwillingness to bow before the monster known as the IRS. He is right, it isn't the money, but the principle that needs to be upheld.
When you bow down before the monster, you are acknowledging a subservient position to the government, something a truly free citizen should never do.
UN ReduxANOTHER report of UN incompetence. This time a report from a former UN inspector in the Food for Oil scam that details that, for the most part, the inspectors were more concerned with throwing beer parties than overseeing what they were assigned to do.
I wonder if the inspectors conducting the searches for WMD's prior to the invasion were just as lax? Saddam KNEW that he was on a short leash, perhaps he managed to ship the bulk of the weapons out prior to the invasion, and adroitly hid the rest? There WERE those mysterious truck convoys to Syria that were never inspected.
Moonbats will point to the fact that the whistle blower was being termed a "disgruntled employee" by the company overseers, yet they will hale any other "disgruntled employee" as a "brave hero exposing the corrupt system" if it's a matter that they wish to hold up as proof of the eeevil administration or heinious Corporate tyrany.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
07:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 2 kb.
Woman Governor in Afghanistan?
The Moonbats keep asking "was the cost in US servicemen's lives worth it?"
My response is that only history will show whether it was or not. But the price in lives in a battle for freedom is always too high, according to the Left.
But HERE we have a demonstration that, JUST MAYBE, the results will justify the cost, and those brave men and women will not have died in vain.
If a country such as Afghanistan can break free of the Muslim templet enough to allow for a woman Governor, it might show that President Bush was correct in his assesment of the situation in the M.E., and it is possible that a new wind of freedom will begin to blow across the whole region.
If it does, it will all be due to the bravery and sacrifices made by the soldiers of the coalition, and not by the Moonbats calls for "tolerance and understanding" of Islamofacists. They are the successors of Chamberlein in calling for "peace in our time", and President Bush will have been shown to be the Churchill of our time.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
07:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 2 kb.
The NUGETed Nugent, a "great American" as Hannity would say. Read this interview and see if you don't agree.
Here's his philosophy in a nutshell:
"No matter where I am, I do news, talk, sports, rock, silly, serious - I do every type of media on the planet - and I've always stood up for the same things," he says, "because the Ten Commandments worked then, and they work now. The Golden Rule worked then, and it works perfectly now. The Declaration of Independence, the Emancipation Proclamation, the Bill of Rights, the U.S. Constitution. These really are pillars of truth and goodwill and sense and decency and reason that I was raised on and disciplined to - there's the key word, I was disciplined to respect and adhere to back when I was growing up, since birth back in 1948.
"And what worked then will work anywhere, anytime forever."