October 17, 2008
The story is from the API (African Press International), and here is the money quote:
"I can tell the American people that My husband loves this country and his adoption never changed his love for this country. He was born in Hawaii, yes, and that gives him all the right to be an American citizen even though he was adopted by a foreigner"; says Michelle Obama on telefon to API.” (emp. mine)
Mrs. Obama is incorrect...IF Barrack HUSSEIN Obama (or should it really be Barrack H. SOETORO?). was adopted by a foreign national, he LOST HIS U.S. CITIZENSHIP at that time, and the only way to regain it would be to be re-naturalized; either way, he would be ineligible to run for POTUS. It isn't a matter of "where his heart lies", it is a matter of LAW.
By Michelle Obama's reasoning, I would make a great candidate for President; after all I LOVE this country with a passion bordering on the fanatical; I served in her Armed Service (UNLIKE "Barry"), and I've never been convicted of a crime against her laws, Federal or State...the fact that I was born in Rotterdam, Netherlands? Just a 'mistake of geography' I rectified at the earliest possible moment.
Mrs. Obama's racist mindset is clearly evident in her conversation with API when she says :
“African press International is supposed to support Africans and African-American view."
OH? , I thought the purpose of the Press was to unbiasedly inform the public of the news of the day, silly me, I should know that they are really supposed to forward a certain agenda...
And
“it is strange that API has chosen to support the racists against my husband. There is no shame in being adopted by a step father..."
No, there is no shame in being adopted by an alien citizen, but it DOES impose some legal repercussions...like being ineligible to be POTUS..
Do the American people REALLY want a person like Michelle Obama representing them as First Lady? More Importantly, do they want a now proven liar to be their President and CiC? (President Clinton notwithstanding, at least he waited until AFTER he was elected to perjure himself...)
The Obama camp is trying to bully the API into not releasing the tapes of the conversation; and they have stated that there 'is no truth to any of the assertions made about BHO's eligibility status'.
But when asked to PROVE that status in a Federal Court case, they refuse to release the proof, instead spending hundreds of thousands of dollars (in what I presume to be campaign funds -- YOUR donations -- all you Obamaidiots) in delaying tactics.
It would take a day and $20. in fees to obtain the necessary legal documents, and all the allegations could be put to rest and the allegers be made to look foolish, yet they spend time and money trying to prevent discovery...there is only ONE reason to do so and that is that there IS something to hide.
Even if it's not something as serious as the allegations raised, do we REALLY want to elect a person who feels so threatened by a truth being revealed that they will go to such lengths to prevent it from being brought into the open?
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
09:19 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 560 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Karlo at October 20, 2008 06:26 AM (AgQ4p)

Posted by: Delftsman3 at October 20, 2008 04:44 PM (wt/Ku)
44 queries taking 0.0378 seconds, 92 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.