June 11, 2005
Take heed of her point, and heed it well, it may mean our survival. The attitude of submission is not one to take with a hungry wolf.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
02:37 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 1 kb.
June 09, 2005
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
04:08 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
June 08, 2005
Any of you savvy folk have any suggestions? Pop them into an e-mail to me.
(delftsman3@sbcglobal.net)
Any help would be most appreciated.
update: And wouldn't you know it, the byline came back on for this post. Still won't go up on the others on rebuild though...
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
03:04 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
June 06, 2005
School vouchers NOW.
"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them… ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,’ I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren’t here".—Senator Dianne Feinstein: CBS-TV’s “60 Minutes”, February 5, 1995
STILL think that total confiscation ISN'T the ultimate goal of the GFW crowd?
"And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition - except for the military,--Pete Shields, Chairman, Handgun Control Inc.
policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors totally illegal."
DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN (U.S. Senator)”…we could tax them [firearms] out of existence.” (Washington Post 4 Nov 93)
MEL REYNOLDS (U.S. Congressman) “If it were up to me we’d ban them all [firearms].” (CNN Crossfire 9 Dec 93)
As a matter of fact they have tried to totally ban ALL handguns allready:
“Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Public Health and Safety Act of 1993 on behalf of myself and nine of my colleagues: MelRep. Stephen J. Solarz, New York (August 12, 1992, The Congressional Record, 102nd Congress, 1992-1993, Daily Edition E2492-2493.)
Reynolds, Bill Clay, Jerry Nadler, Eleanor Holmes Norton, John Lewis, Nydia Velazquez, Ron Dellums, Carrie Meek, and Alcee Hastings. This legislation, first introduced in the Senate by Senator John Chafee, would prohibit the transfer or possession of handguns and handgun ammunition, except in limited circumstances. It would go a long way toward protecting our citizens from violent crime. The need for a ban on handguns cannot be overstated. Unlike rifles and shotguns, handguns are easily concealable. Consequently, they are the weapons of choice in most murders, accounting for the deaths of 25,000 Americans in 1991......"
Too bad for these GFW's that there is that pesky little thing called the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights, and enough (barely) people that still understand the concept of individual rights to block them from their ultimate goal....so far.
WE THE PEOPLE must remain ever vigilant and protective of these rights, or all too soon the concept of a free republic wherein the government derives its power FROM the PEOPLE will disappear, and the vision of the founding fathers but a distant memory.
AND as one commenter suggested, lest you think that this is just a RightWingNut type propaganda, Google: "Amnesty International"Cuba(526,000results) and then "Amnesty International" /guantanamo -guantánamo.(303,000 results): in other words, Amnesty international has over 1/2 as many current referrals to reports/"informative alerts" for ONE facility that has been operating for less than five years as it does for HUNDREDS of prisons that have been in operation for more than 40 years. And I challenge you to peruse all 526,000 of those results about the Castro prisons and find ONE of them referred to as a "gulag"....
Lets see...we have a facility with color tv. microwave ovens, flush toilets, shower facilities, three "hots" and a cot for every prisoner. Where a prisoner is "tortured" by losing a little sleep when he has been recalterent...and yes, don't forget, they may have to listen to some of that evil western rock music when the guards want to hear something from home. And its a Gulag, I tell you!
Contrast that to a multileval prison, where the excrement from the upper levels descend down through slits in the floor to accumulate in the lowermost cells; where the prisoners lie on the bare concrete, are never certain as to when they may receive food, but are assured that when they do, it will be of the variety that a farmer here would be embarrassed to slop his hogs with. Where REAL torture is utilyzed on a daily, and for some prisoners on a 24 hr basis. Where a common form of "punishment" is to attach the jumper cables to a prisoner's gonads....NOT to extract military information vital to protecting soldiers in an active war zone, mind you, or even to obtain a confession of a crime. It's done because the guards are bored, and they can. This has been occurring for over 40 years.
And when making their speeches on the heinious activities in countries around the world, AI is strangley silent when it comes to Cuba...as they were with the Gulags in Siberia, or the trading in human misery in North Korea....but they sure can trumpet it loud when there is an incident of fraternity type hazing in a US facility. AI is morally bankrupt. I suggest that you don't support them in any of their endevors, although I do feel sorry for that; AI COULD have been a great force for good in the world, until idiology triumphed over their mission of highlighting state-sponsered atrocities.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
10:27 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 452 words, total size 3 kb.
Here is Mamamotezz's take on it:
This is so much crap.
IF he was involved in a traffic incident,
IF a group of irate individuals had surrounded his vehicle,
IF he felt his safety and his child's safety were compromised,
IF he believed that the rock eluded to in this sniveler's piece was
only the trigger item to what could have been an escalating situation,
IF he felt he had no recourse but to pull the gun,
then he did exactly the right thing.
He pulled it before the other person was able to throw the rock and hit
the car, potentially entering it and hurting his child, also
potentially inciting the rest of this angry group into joining in.
Given the limited information in this editorial piece, common actually,
since no one wants the facts to get in the way of an opinion, I still
find no fault in the actions of this driver. Had I angered a group of
unknown people and felt threatened by their bahaviors, I would have done
exactly the same. '
Tell Reginald Denny it was only a rock and only meant to damage his
truck.
*************************************************************
I can only say that I agree with Mama. The editorialist tried the GFW tactic of saying it "wasn't politeness engendered by the weapon, it was fear" Well Exxxxcuuuuuse me! Obviousman is apparently a newspaper editor in Salt Lake City. use of a weapon in self defense is SUPPOSED to engender fear in the possible recipients of lethal action, and to stop escalation to the point where that force is required; thats the non-lethal purpose of a weapon.
I suppose that Mr. Schanze could have just waited until the crowd got really ugly before doing anything....but by his actions, he forstalled any escalation in the incident, and no one was hurt or any further property damaged.
The last sentence in the opinion is particularly telling:
"Some people, who carry large sums of money or have specific reasons to feel endangered, may be safer if they are armed.
The rest of us are not. "
Just HOW in HELL does this man presume to inform us that "we'd be safer if we didn't have the means to defend ourselves when we feel threatened"?!?
It's hard to tell if Mr. Schanze was legally justified from the meager facts in the story, but the fact remains that, in HIS mind at least, HE felt threatened enough to warrent exposing his weapon, AND he didn't USE deadly force, he merely showed himself capable of doing so, should the situation come to justify it, and in the process, defused the situation. I say give the guy a slap on the back and a "well done".
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
12:29 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 469 words, total size 3 kb.
June 02, 2005
Such is the case with his essay Traitors Within Our Walls. Karlo got me to thinking about those "soldiers of a different stripe". His heroes, my traitors. This essay refutes karlo's basic philosophy in a way that I never could.
Kim showed by historical example of the grave danger these people pose to the Republic, by applying those examples to the present day. He said it far better than I ever could. Do yourself a favor and read it. Savor it. Make it part of your continuing education.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at
12:25 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
47 queries taking 0.0769 seconds, 136 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








